View My Guestbook
Sign My Guestbook
Visitors to Date
Eager to have YOUR voice heard? Get your OWN web page at
US Communist Party Supports Kerry!!
September 15, 2004
Guess who else is endorsing John Kerry? The Communist Party of The United
States of America, CPUSA, is publicly supporting the election of John Kerry.
No, this is not a typo...you read it correctly. The CPUSA has made available on
its Web site an advertisement entitled "Top Ten Reasons To Defeat Bush."
This advertisement can be downloaded and is available in English and Spanish. The
communist party urges readers to place this ad in local newspapers throughout the
country to defeat President Bush. Remarkably, the "Top Ten Reasons" of the
Communist party are identical to those
of the Democratic party; out-sourcing, homosexual rights, abortion and the like.
At first, it was thought "this was only a coincidence." The Democratic party of
the United States couldn't be in lock step with the Marxists! So, the originator
of this email wrote to a spokesman of the CPUSA in Georgia and here is part of
the spokesman's letter:
"The CPUSA supports the John Kerry campaign with donations and volunteer
effort. We believe that defeating George Bush is the single most important
issue this November." Next, it was discovered that one of Kerry's campaign
themes is "Let America
be America Again." This slogan was borrowed from a Communist poet, Langston
Hughes. This is not common knowledge to the average American. "Let America
be America Again" sounds good but is a rambling, gloomy poem. Interestingly,
another poem by Langston goes as follows; "Goodbye, Christ
Jesus, Lord, God, Jehovah, Beat it on away from here now. Make way for a new
guy with no religion at all -- A real guy named Marx, communist, Lenin, Peasant,
Stalin, Worker, ME -- I said, ME!"
Then, if this was not convincing enough that the Democratic party has lost it,
a third even more disturbing discovery! A Vietnam vet group took a trip to
Communist Hanoi to investigate a report
that John Kerry was in the "Hanoi! Hall of Fame." Yes, there is a museum
in Hanoi with a section dedicated to foreign activists
who help defeat the United States Military in Vietnam. Of course, you would
expect Jane Fonda's picture to be there. But, alas, there is John Kerry's
picture shaking the hand of a communist official.
Never has there been such a tragedy! Never has there been such a threat to
America! Has the Democratic Party has been taken over by the far, far left?
It's not only the communists, but the homosexual activists who are appalled
that George W. Bush is married to a woman! They are enraged that the President
wants a constitutional amendment to protect traditional marriage between a man
Then we have the ACLU running to a federal activist judge with every piece of
legislation that doesn't fit into their leftist agenda. They support every
Democratic socialist whim. The removal of the Ten Commandments is their top priority!
Want to read it for yourself? Visit the
US Communist Party website read the propaganda,
articles, mission statements and then decide for yourself.
Text borrowed from
Davie FL Republican Club
Mark Twain told us that "common sense is not that common."
Truer words have never been spoken, and it is very possible that a
shorter, yet so complete definition of common sense may never be given.
Don't Be Left Out
See your comment or contribution
What Does John Kerry Stand For?
September 9, 2004
Does John Kerry know what the average American wants? Does he feel our concern
regarding the evil people who threaten to destroy our liberty and way of life?
Can he understand our concern about the future of our economy and the importance
of making the recent tax cuts permanent? How about his comprehension of our desire
to ensure a strong, safe, proud America for our children and grandchildren as
well? What about our need to be making the difficult decisions now and
sacrificing during these challenging times for the benefit of our great nation's
prosperous and promising future?
I am afraid that John Kerry doesn't even seem to know himself. I do believe
that he sincerely desires to be our president, but I do not know what he
believes he can do for America. You don't get this most important job in the
world by wanting it alone. Neither do you get it by pandering to every person
and group or zigzagging down the highway of our nations political highway
attempting to stay in the middle of the road on every issue. He needs to
interview for the job, explain his vision and long-term plans for our country.
What does he aim to overhaul, fix, improve and how will he go about doing it?
Flitting like a humming bird from each newly blossoming issue to the next
shows no dedication. No willingness to question, study, learn, and ultimately
inspires no faith in the voting population. The voter wants to feel some
emotion and trust that his or her vote is important and can actually make a
difference. The behavior thus far displayed by candidate John Kerry actually
shows the people that he does not truly care about anything other that adding
US President to his resume.
The Liberal Threat?
August 29, 2004
As long as their principle spokesmen are harvested from the field of entertainers I expect no
serious competition. Although I can see one true threat. There are an enormous amount of Americans
that look upon our entertainers as royalty. If you can bounce a ball or repeat someone else's words
then your every move, whether on the stage, court, field or anywhere else will unquestionably
be worshiped by very many confused Americans. Let me back up and clarify that my problem is not
with entertainers. What really bugs me are the incredible number of people that spend hours
and hours of their own lives reading and learning about the off-stage lives and activities of
entertainers. There are so many magazines, newspapers, and television shows dedicated to the
discussion and exploration of the lives, thoughts and interests of entertainers. I just cannot
understand the infatuation.
And when these people, already accustomed to the spotlights, are placed upon pedestals even when
the theater is closed, its not so unexpected that their responses would be to "put on a show".
The more outlandish they appear the more attention they get. And who among that crowd wouldn't
want that? I mean, that's how they make their living, by putting on a show and getting your
So if you are wondering about what the liberal threat could be, I would have to say that it
is principally misinforming the gullible Americans. But these are the folks that ask for it, so
can we truly blame the entertainers? Nah, they are simply responding with the repeated cries of
encore. After that, they demand ridiculously higher salaries and ticket prices. But its okay
because y'all love 'em.
Stay Informed, Get Involved
Feel Like No One Listens?
See your comment or contribution
Past Articles and Opinions
Can You Understand the Hate?
August 26, 2004
I've been to multiple chat rooms and even created a pro-Bush screen name to attract
attention. The many dozens of people I talk to are all completely incapable of
participating in a civilized discussion. They are all quite prolific in their
repetition of curse words, anti-Bush slogans, name calling, and their employment
of tactical evasion of relevance when involved in discussion. They often begin
by attempting to bait me with questions such as "do you really support Bush", "what
do you think of the situation in Iraq"' or "how come you Americans are so barbaric
and can support a president who alienates the entire world"? "Even Christians around
the world think the war is wrong and that their belief in peace is the answer."
My answers are usually brief and to the point because it doesn't take much to tell
you why I support President Bush George W. Bush and our war on terrorism. Our current
president has been faced with incredible challenges that no other American president
has ever had to deal with. I support President Bush because he has made these
decisions in the face of incredible challenges and taken decisive action that he
thought would preserve this great nation and protect my children's future. On
top of that, he made those difficult decisions without regard to his own political future but with the patriotic desire to do his presidential duties and defend our nation, constitution and way of life.
Concerning Iraq, we did what we had to do faced with the information we had.
I support preemptive action to protect and preserve my nation and family. I was
devastated by the horribly evil attacks we suffered on September 11, 2001.
In no way at all can I believe that we "deserved it," and I have no desire to
ever see anything like that again in our homeland. The poor quality of the
worldwide intelligence community was an atrocious failure. As the richest and
most powerful nation on Earth, we should have led the way rather than fall
embarrassingly on our faces in our gathering of information.
I support peace as well. I share in the Christian belief of peace. And I know
that our goal is always peace. But peace only works in a society that respects it.
Unfortunately a belief alone provides no protection. Peace is a cooperative
effort. The USA has always followed a procedure of preemptive peace. But once
it is violated, what do you do next? Peace can only be done proactively but
really serves no useful purpose reactively. I mean, explain to me how you
react peacefully to unwarranted aggression: to surprise attacks on
non-combatants; to the killing of little children and innocent men and women
in their homes and offices? Exactly how is self-defense barbaric? The
United States has always been the home of the most humane warriors in
history. We capture rather than kill, disarm rather than fight, negotiate
rather than attack, send billions in aid to hundreds of less fortunate
nations and people worldwide, and always invest billions of dollars and
years of work into rebuilding what was damaged or destroyed by us or others.
What other nation in history has even come close to doing what we have done
and continue to do in response to worldwide needs and requests for aid?
Their responses are usually long, weak, invoke fictional data, incorporate
extremely foul language and are shouted loudly or typed in bold capital
letters. But the content is void of any actual facts, no relevant rebuttal
is included and they usually try to alter the original subject as a
distraction. I am not sure whether this tactic is an intentional
distraction or simply the unconscious attempt to avoid the possibility of
truth or facts.
I do not understand the hate, though I have patiently tried.
Oh, and one other thing these angry people never mention in their George W.
Bush, anti-American rants......John Kerry.
Democrats Hood-Winked and Exposed!!
September 1, 2004
Continually misunderestimated, our President George W. Bush has done it again! The Republican National
Committee is holding its national convention in downtown Liberalville New York City. The Left
has repeatedly questioned the wisdom of holding the Republican Convention in such a liberally biased
location, yet once again they never failed to follow through with the thought and actually figure
out what its all about. The Libs have planned all sorts of massive protests, marches, nude dances,
as well as called for entertainment and transportation strikes, service personnel walk-outs, and even
gone so far as to actually advocate civil disobedience! Why, they've even coordinated a cadre of attorneys
offering pro-bono representation for anyone who will actually go far enough across the line of decency
to have themselves arrested.
Wow! Can you just imagine where we might be if all of this inexplicable hate
was focused into creative energy and applied to the positive improvement of our nation?? Tell you what...if
these hate-mongers could possibly organize themselves, become truly informed of facts,
introduce a candidate that excites the people rather than just someone who is "not Bush",
then I might actually worry that they would present such a formidable opponent that doom would
surely befall our great nation.
©2001-2004 - All rights reserved.